Historical Map of Philosophies
This was made in conjunction with Sonnet-3.7, then rebuilt as a D3 force graph so the connections can be quantised. Each edge now carries a type (was this an influence, a teaching relationship, an outright rejection, a synthesis, a response, or a speculative cross-tradition parallel?) and a weight in the 0–1 range (line thickness encodes how load-bearing the relationship is). Each node is sized by its degree centrality: the more philosophers a thinker connects to in the graph, the larger their dot. Drag a node to pull it; scroll to zoom; hover for the philosopher’s central idea, dates, and in/out edge counts. The pill toggles above the graph let you isolate a single edge type or peel periods off one at a time.
Philosophy Timeline Color Key
- ■ Ancient Philosophy
Greek, Roman, early Chinese, Indian and other traditions (c. 600 BCE - 500 CE) - ■ Medieval Philosophy
Islamic, Christian, Jewish, Buddhist and other scholastic traditions (c. 500 - 1400 CE) - ■ Renaissance Philosophy
Humanism, early modern thought, reformation (c. 1400 - 1600 CE) - ■ Early Modern Philosophy
Rationalism, empiricism, enlightenment (c. 1600 - 1800 CE) - ■ Modern Philosophy
Idealism, utilitarianism, pragmatism, early analytic (c. 1800 - 1900 CE) - ■ Contemporary Philosophy
Analytic, continental, postmodern traditions (c. 1900 CE - present) - ■ Non-Western Traditions
Distinctive Asian, African, Indigenous philosophical systems (across all periods)
Note: Philosophers categorised by their primary period of influence, though many worked across traditional boundaries.
Edge Type Key
- — Influenced
The default relation: A's ideas shaped B's, without being explicitly synthesised, taught, or refused (c. 0.3–0.7 weight). - — Taught
A direct teacher–student relationship, or a documented mentorship (Socrates → Plato, Russell → Wittgenstein, Husserl → Heidegger). - — Synthesised
B explicitly rebuilt or fused A's framework into something new (Aquinas synthesising Aristotle via Averroes; Marx inverting Hegel; Frege foundationally rebuilt by Russell). - – – Responded to
B took A as an interlocutor without simply accepting or rejecting them (Hume waking Kant from his dogmatic slumber; Berkeley answering Locke). - - - Rejected
An explicit refusal: Al-Ghazali against Avicenna, Schopenhauer against Hegel, Kierkegaard against the Hegelian system, Nozick against Rawls. - · · Cross-tradition parallel
A speculative or structural resonance rather than documented influence (Zhuangzi and Heraclitus on flux; Nagarjuna and Sextus on skepticism; Laozi and Spinoza on monism). Weighted low on purpose.
Edge weights are an editorial judgement, not a metric. The intent is for relative thickness within the graph to track how load-bearing each connection is in the historical record. Future iterations could derive these from citation counts.
Comments (0)